AI-103 Practice Question 79: Extractive Versus Abstractive Summary
Microsoft Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer Associate (AI-103) · Test 8 · question 9 of 10
A compliance team needs to summarize lengthy regulatory filings. Their auditors require that every sentence appearing in a summary be an exact, unaltered quote lifted from the source filing, so a reviewer can trace each summary sentence back to its precise wording without any rephrasing.
Which Azure AI Language summarization capability satisfies this requirement?
Show answer and explanation
Answer:
Extractive summarization "produces a summary by extracting salient sentences within the source text"; the returned sentences are, in Microsoft's own words, "original sentences extracted from the input text content," each with a rank score and its exact positional offset in the source. That guarantee of verbatim, traceable wording is exactly the auditors' requirement.
- A is wrong because abstractive summarization deliberately does the opposite: it "generates a summary with concise, coherent sentences or words that aren't verbatim extract sentences from the original source"; a fluent paraphrase is the point, which breaks the auditors' word-for-word traceability requirement. - C is wrong because issue/resolution summarization is a conversation-summarization feature built for customer-service dialogue transcripts, not for condensing a plain-text regulatory document. - D is wrong because key phrase extraction returns short standalone terms, not a coherent summary made of extracted sentences; it wouldn't read as a summary at all.
Reference: What is summarization?